Ben & Jerry’s has always been synonymous with social activism, high-quality products, and a brand identity built around progressive causes. However, co-founder Jerry Greenfield highlights a deeper conflict between authentic brand values and the structural pressures of being part of a global giant like Unilever.
And, as a consequence, he has left.
Jerry Greenfield stated publicly that Ben & Jerry’s has lost its autonomy to speak out on important social issues. In an open letter, shared by its colleague Ben Cohen on X, he said he could no longer work “in good faith” for a company that has been “silenced” by Unilever. The flashpoint was the brand’s decision to stop selling its ice cream in Israeli settlements—a move that sparked tension with its parent company over the extent to which its social mission could be publicly expressed.
After 47 years, Jerry has made the difficult decision to step down from the company we built together. I’m sharing his words as he resigns from Ben & Jerry’s. His legacy deserves to be true to our values, not silenced by @MagnumGlobal #FreeBenAndJerrys pic.twitter.com/EZXGRjs76a — Ben Cohen (@YoBenCohen) September 17, 2025
After 47 years, Jerry has made the difficult decision to step down from the company we built together. I’m sharing his words as he resigns from Ben & Jerry’s. His legacy deserves to be true to our values, not silenced by @MagnumGlobal #FreeBenAndJerrys pic.twitter.com/EZXGRjs76a
— Ben Cohen (@YoBenCohen) September 17, 2025
This conflict is not new. It dates back to the original merger agreement with Unilever over two decades ago, which explicitly protected Ben & Jerry’s social mission. Both Greenfield and his co-founder Ben Cohen agree that this agreement has been disregarded.
“That independence existed in no small part because of the unique merger agreement Ben and I negotiated with Unilever (…) It is profoundly disappointing to come to the conclusion that that independence is gone.“
Ben & Jerry’s began in 1978, when Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield invested $12,000 to open their first ice cream scoop shop in a renovated gas station in Burlington, Vermont.
Their business quickly expanded: within a few years they started selling ice cream in pints to local stores, opened franchised scoop shops, added flavors like “Cherry Garcia,” and established the Ben & Jerry’s Foundation to donate a share of profits to community projects. In 2000 the company was acquired by Unilever, but retained an independent Board of Directors to protect its social mission, quality, and brand integrity. Over the decades, Ben & Jerry’s has pursued fair trade sourcing, activism, and expanding non-dairy options.
Ver esta publicación en Instagram Una publicación compartida de Ben & Jerry’s (@benandjerrys)
Una publicación compartida de Ben & Jerry’s (@benandjerrys)
The Ben & Jerry’s vs. Unilever case is a cautionary tale for any purpose-led brand. It proves that a social mission isn’t just a marketing strategy—it’s a strategic core that requires value alignment, governance, and operational freedom to live and breathe. When that breaks down, credibility—a brand’s most valuable asset in today’s market—starts to crumble.
Image: Ben & Jerry’s
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Δ